Connect with us

Cannabis Now

Cannabis Now

Cannabis & Cancer: Fake News Is Winning, and That’s a Problem

Cannabis & Cancer: Fake News is Winning, and That’s a Problem
PHOTO Jennifer Moo

Medical

Cannabis & Cancer: Fake News Is Winning, and That’s a Problem

Online searches for cancer cures are leading desperate people to be deceived by fake news about cannabis. The good news just isn’t there yet.

Joy Smith lives in the United Kingdom, where — up until last fall — cannabis was illegal in all applications (and, despite some advances in drug-policy reform, remains prohibited on a practical level). In 2016, Joy Smith was diagnosed with late-stage pancreatic cancer and given six weeks to live.

In pain, desperate, Smith supplemented her chemotherapy with cannabis oil — full-spectrum Rick Simpson oil, THC and all, which she had to break the law to obtain.

You probably know where this is going. In 2019, Joy Smith is alive. Her cancer is no longer terminal. Smith credits cannabis oil for her remarkable turnaround. She credits the medicine for saving her life, for “curing” her cancer.

Which means — sorry, but it’s true! — that Smith is also a bit of a fibber. And whether she knows it or not, she’s making it easier for many other much more unscrupulous and vile people to prey on susceptible and desperate people.

Cannabis absolutely appears to help people suffering from cancer. Cannabis helps them sleep, cannabis helps them eat, cannabis is good for pain. Cancer causes pain, cancer treatments like chemotherapy can make it difficult to eat, and stress and anxiety are hell on sleep, which the body needs to heal. These are observations supported by research as well as anecdotes.

But treating symptoms or side effects is different than treating the disease. Does cannabis do that? Maybe! But we just don’t know yet.

Yes, there is that Guzman study, in which THC was found to shrink tumors in rats. Yes, there are plenty of people who are using cannabis as part of their cancer treatment and having success. But is it chemo and cannabis, radiation and cannabis? Does cannabis make the conventional treatments more successful, or just easier to handle? Is it THC, is it CBD, is it a particular terpene? Is it good for this cancer, or bad for that one?

The only honest answer is that we don’t know. We don’t, because nobody knows — not researchers, not physicians — and anyone saying they know for certain is lying and probably selling something.

As some medical researchers observed in a recent article published in the journalCureus, the internet is full of such charlatans in search of easy prey — and whether terminal or not, cancer patients and their families appear especially susceptible to such flummery,

Siyu Shi, Arthur Brant, and Erqi Pollom are radiation oncologists at Stanford University, which is located in Palo Alto, California. That’s in the Bay Area — that is, one of the most marijuana friendly regions in the world. Aaron Sabloch is also a radiation oncologist, in Portland, Oregon, also a legal state with a thriving cannabis industry.

Troubled by promises of cancer treatment proliferating online (possibly the marijuana world’s most pernicious example of “fake news”) the oncologists took a look at some internet search trends and found that over the past seven years, there’s been a marked increase in the number of Google searches for cannabis and cancer.

Fulfilling this need, several questionable websites that source poorly or not at all have posted content that’s gone absolutely viral — that promises, without qualification, that cannabis cured various cancers.

Of the 10 most viral online stories that made these claims, at least two referenced  Smith, the researchers found. The accurate information is out there, but in what’s become a sad trend — visible during the 2016 election, and visible now — it was the fake news that went wild on Facebook and that your excitable relatives and friends won’t stop posting about.

“The top false news story proposing cannabis as a cancer cure, ‘Cancer institute finally admits marijuana kills cancer,’ generated 4.26 million engagements,” the researchers wrote. “Snopes, a fact-checking organization, published a report challenging this false news story, but this report generated only 2,207 total engagements.”

Essentially, there’s an information war afoot on the internet about cannabis and cancer — and facts and truth are losing, bad.

It’s not at all that mainstream medicine doesn’t like cannabis. Far from it. According to the researchers, 80 percent of oncologists discuss cannabis with their patients, and 46 percent recommend using cannabis to control their symptoms.

Here’s an anecdote for you: my dad has cancer. Stage IV. Metastatic cancer. I tried to get him to use cannabis for years — years! — before he finally started taking a 1:1 gelcap mix, about 10 milligrams each of THC and CBD, before bed. He’s doing great now, but he’s also on immunotherapy and other conventional cancer treatments. Had he ditched his oncologist for cannabis, I am positive he would be dead. I believe the cannabis is helping in some way, but I have no proof for this and I cannot be sure.

Not everyone exists in a network, personal and online, that is so rational. As per the researchers, almost 40 percent of news stories shared on social media concerned alternative cures — and of these, the most common claimed alternative treatment was cannabis. That is, most stories about treating cancer in unconventional ways are untrue.

“[T]he false news of a cannabis cancer cure is spreading quickly online and interest in such news stories is rapidly rising,” the research article concludes. “In the face of this concerning increase, there has been a minimal online presence by major cancer hospitals and organizations,” who have an opportunity and a challenge to present measured and accurate information.

I would like to think that Smith — who, you should remember, did not abandon her conventional cancer treatment but supplemented it with cannabis — isn’t consciously guilty of spreading false hope. I think she believes the cannabis helped. But for now, that is exactly what anyone who claims “cannabis cures cancer” is doing.

TELL US, have you read an article that claims cannabis cures cancer? 

2 Comments

2 Comments

  1. Sally

    April 17, 2019 at 7:54 am

    Yes I have seen many videos and stories about Rick Simpson and his Phoenix Tears. He cured himself and 5000 other people.
    The young boy from the UK. Had the worst kind of leukemia. The highest white blood cell count his doctors had ever seen. He got so bad doctors gave him 3 days to live. His parents started giving him the oil. He got better. He is now 17 and cancer free.
    Tommy Chong cured his cancer with cannabis oil. Lots and lots of other stories!

  2. Justin Kander

    April 12, 2019 at 2:12 pm

    I honestly thought such poorly analyzed and thought-out analyses were long gone, but it appears they are still going strong. Extremely disappointing to see Cannabis Now publish something like this frankly. Most ridiculously, this article calls out a patient who had real success with cannabis medicine in addition to chemotherapy, a terminal cancer, and whose cancer went into remission with that combination. I thought it was going to go into why that wasn’t true, but apparently the author accepts this happens but still criticizes the patient for sharing her story? So I guess people who heal through natural means should just shut up and not tell anyone, just let other people die and hold onto that hope for yourself. Wow.

    But far more importantly, as all of these kinds of arrogant analyses do, it leaves out so much. First, there are dozens of preclinical studies showing how THC and CBD kill virtually all major types of cancer cells, not just “that Guzman study” which implies there is just one or a few. Second, many studies show endocannabinoids kill cancer cells through similar mechanisms as THC and CBD, making it far more likely the phytocannabinoids would work in humans. Third, there is a placebo-controlled trial showing how THC and CBD extend life in glioblastoma patients, a result that cannot be explained by patients just tolerating treatment or feeling better. Fourth, for the past 10 years there have been hundreds of people reporting remissions with cannabis, either by itself or in combination with chemotherapy and radiation. Fifth, other “radical” preclinical results have translated to humans, like CBD for epilepsy. The supporting science for that is actually quite weak as they use chemical-induced seizures, much simpler than the genetically-driven seizures CBD has 100% proven to reduce as a result of double-blind trials. So we know radical preclinical results can translate to humans, actually better than the preclinical evidence suggests!

    That said, of course cannabis does not work for everyone and conventional treatments are still critically important. But this is not false hope. If someone has cancer, especially terminal, knowing high doses of cannabis may save them is important. They should know it’s not guaranteed, but they also need to know there is REAL hope of remission. And people who write these stupid, low-level analyses are guilty of taking this real hope away from patients who are considering it. You should have done more research before publishing this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in Medical

To Top