Connect with us

Cannabis Now

Cannabis Now

The State of Cannabis Today: When Will We See Federal Pot Reform?

When Will We See Federal Cannabis Reform?
Photo by Gracie Malley for Cannabis Now

Politics

The State of Cannabis Today: When Will We See Federal Pot Reform?

Here are the bud basics you need to know about the state of cannabis legalization in the United States, right now.

Having cannabis removed from the federal list of controlled substances has long been the holy grail of legalization advocates. Several bills have now been introduced on Capitol Hill to do exactly that, but do any stand a chance of becoming law in the current polarized climate?

Here’s what you need to know today about where cannabis is currently legal in the United States, what pathways to federal legalization are opening up and what the chances are that we’ll see cannabis legalized in 2020.

What States Have Legal or Medicinal Cannabis?

The feds have in practice mostly left cannabis enforcement to the states, who have been able to get away with writing their own laws around cannabis. And many states have now either generally legalized cannabis or legalized its use for medicinal purposes. Since Colorado and Washington led the way in 2012, a total of 11 states have now legalized for what is called the “adult use” or “recreational” market. Most have done so by popular referendum, but two — Vermont and Illinois — by acts of the state legislature.

With medical marijuana, it’s a little complicated. The short answer is that since California passed the nation’s first medical cannabis law in 1996, a total of 33 states have passed medical marijuana laws (of widely varying degrees of leniency) either by legislation or referendum. But some of these states, including New York and Minnesota, only allow the use of extracts — not actual herbaceous cannabis. And several other states have CBD-only laws — allowing the use of cannabidiol but not its intoxicating counterpart THC. 

So there is some ambiguity on what exactly constitutes a medical marijuana law. 

In any case, none of these laws override the federal prohibition of cannabis. Interstate and international trafficking are still policed by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), and federal law still poses myriad obstacles to the normalization of even state-legal cannabis businesses. Legal interstate commerce in cannabis, as has now been called for by state law in Oregon and at least broached by the governors of New York and Connecticut, will not be possible until federal law changes.

What Legalization Measures Are Now Before Congress?

Cannabis remains a Schedule I substance under the 1970 Controlled Substances Act — the most restrictive category, absurdly shared with heroin. Among the several pending measures in Congress to change federal prohibition are some laws that failed to pass last year but were re-introduced in 2019. 

The Marijuana Justice Act was introduced in the House by Rep. Barbara Lee and in the Senate by Cory Booker. It has won support from Rep. Carolyn Maloney of the Congressional Cannabis Caucus, which was established in 2017. In addition to descheduling, the bill would expunge all federal convictions for possessing or using cannabis.

Also introduced early this year by Rep. Earl Blumenauer, co-chair of the Cannabis Caucus, was the Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol Act, wryly dubbed HR 420. Under this bill, responsibility for regulating cannabis would be switched from the Drug Enforcement Administration to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). 

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer also reintroduced his Marijuana Freedom and Opportunity Act this spring. A somewhat more cautious bill, it would also deschedule cannabis, but would reserve federal power to prevent “trafficking” to states that have not legalized — leaving a cannabis enforcement role for the DEA. 

Also reintroduced in the spring was the Strengthening the Tenth Amendment Through Entrusting States (STATES) Act, which had been first introduced last year by Senators Elizabeth Warren and Cory Gardner. A still less ambitious piece of legislation, it would create an exemption from the Controlled Substances Act for states that have legalized cannabis without actually descheduling the plant. The STATES Act would also apply to Native American reservations and would bar federal forfeiture of any assets derived from state-legal cannabis enterprises.

In July, Rep. Jerrold Nadler and presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris introduced the Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement (MORE) Act, which legalization advocacy group NORML calls “arguably the most revolutionary and socially conscious federal marijuana reform bill introduced to date.” In addition to descheduling cannabis and expunging prior convictions, the MORE Act would establish social equity programs for cannabis entrepreneurs, with a focus on those communities that have been most adversely impacted by cannabis prohibition.

In a Capitol Hill hearing this July that advocates hailed as “historic,” numerous Congress members openly embraced lifting the federal strictures on cannabis — and even descheduling. The discussion was particularly framed in terms of recognizing and correcting the racial and social iniquities of cannabis prohibition and the War on Drugs.

What’s the Status of the SAFE Banking Act? 

A bill that would make it easier for cannabis businesses to access the federally regulated banking system is the Secure and Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act, which actually passed the House in late September, by a vote of 321 to 103. This legislation would reform banking regulations affecting institutions that handle cannabis-related accounts, basically allowing cannabis businesses operating in conformity with state law to access financial services. It got a big boost in May, when a group of attorneys general from 38 states and territories penned an open letter urging Congress to pass the bill.

Republicans in the House were narrowly divided in their vote on the SAFE Banking Act — so this may bode well for its chances in the Senate. It may also be an encouraging sign for passage of one of the above-mentioned legalization bills. Getting a legalization bill through the Republican-controlled Senate will obviously pose a far greater challenge than the (daunting enough) prospect of passage by the Democratic-controlled House. The Republican commitment to “states’ rights” served some GOP lawmakers to support the SAFE Banking Act. The libertarian streak in the Republican Party could, conceivably, move enough votes in the Senate to get a legalization measure over the top — despite the intransigent attitude of the Trump White House. Which of course raises the prospect of a presidential veto, and the greater challenge still of mustering enough votes to override it.

In short, we may be closer to federal legalization than ever before. But there’s a lot of hurdles to get past before you light up a celebratory joint.

What Other Cannabis-Related Legislation Is Pending?

We saw another sign of hope in June, when the House approved legislation that could significantly lift the federal pressure on cannabis. Building on longstanding policy that bars federal cannabis enforcement in medical marijuana states, the House passed a measure that would instate a similar hands-off approach to enforcement in states that have generally legalized. The measure came as a rider to an appropriations bill, sponsored by representatives Earl Blumenauer, Tom McClintock and Eleanor Holmes Norton.

Yesterday, on Oct. 31, the Senate approved their version of the spending legislation that also prohibited the Department of Justice from using any funds to prosecute anyone in compliance with state cannabis laws. (Federal cannabis enforcement in medical marijuana states has been effectively restrained since passage of the Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment in 2014.)

Also in June, the House passed a measure pushed by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez that would cut some funding to the DEA and transfer the money into opioid treatment programs.  

Legislation introduced in the House in March would protect the jobs of federal employees who use cannabis in states where their use is legal. The Fairness in Federal Drug Testing Under State Laws Act would prohibit testing for cannabis “from being used as the sole factor to deny or terminate federal employment for civilian positions at executive branch agencies if the individual is in compliance with the marijuana laws in their state of residence.”

Sen. Booker last year also introduced legislation that would eliminate drug convictions as a bar to federal financial aid. At issue is the document formally known as the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA), which includes the following text: “Have you been convicted for the possession or sale of illegal drugs for an offense that occurred while you were receiving federal student aid (such as grants, work-study, or loans)?” That bill, which would remove the offending text from FAFSA, has also been reintroduced this year.

TELL US, do you want cannabis to be federally legal?

1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. YearofAction

    November 2, 2019 at 12:43 am

    Literal cannabis reform could be the foundation for any of the bills listed here.

    We can encourage our members of Congress, and our favored congressional candidates, to legislate this reconstructed definition of marijuana that carefully deschedules cannabis, returns its control back to the states and the people-not to the corporations, and also upholds our U.S. Constitution with its clarity.

    Sec. 802.
    (16) The term “marijuana” means all parts of the smoke produced by the combustion of the plant Cannabis sativa L., which is, as are the viable seeds of such plant, prohibited to be grown by or sold by any publicly traded corporation or subsidiary company, and such smoke is prohibited to be inhaled by any child or by any person bearing any firearm, as is their intake of any part or any product of such plant containing more than 0.3% THC by weight unless prescribed to such child by an authorized medical practitioner.

    It’s better than this confusing definition that is now law:

    Sec. 802.
    (16)(A) Subject to subparagraph (B), the term “marihuana” means all parts of the plant Cannabis sativa L., whether growing or not; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of such plant; and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such plant, its seeds or resin.
    (B) The term “marihuana” does not include (i) hemp, as defined in section 297A of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946; or (ii) the mature stalks of such plant, fiber produced from such stalks, oil or cake made from the seeds of such plant, any other compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such mature stalks (except the resin extracted therefrom), fiber, oil, or cake, or the sterilized seed of such plant which is incapable of germination.

    Ask them: What Schedule 1 “other substance” is “all parts of the plant Cannabis sativa L.” and simultaneously “does not include the mature stalks of such plant”?

    Tell them upholding the Constitution is important for your vote. See what they say.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in Politics

To Top